“Don’t
mess with the volcano my man, ‘cause I will go Pompeii on your…Butt!” – Mr.
Furious
This article summarizes an approach
known as PTA, or Primary Trait Analysis. Baughin et al. argue that PTA is the
best approach to take in the classroom because it is efficient, explicit, and
fair. Not only is it efficient and fair for teachers to use, it is also
efficient and fair for students because it includes them in the process and
explains to them the scoring rubric in depth before it is used to grade and
assignment. Primary Trait Analysis is an explicitly designed rubric that is
conveyed to students before they begin, complete, and turn in an
assignment. Also, I think that including students in the process of creating
such a specific rubric will help boost their confidence as they set out to
complete their assignment and achieve the goals that have been set for them.
The benefits of such an explicit
rubric for any assignment cannot be ignored. First of all, it makes it easy for
teachers to systematically grade assignments if they know exactly what they
expect and are looking for in any given assignment before they start to grade
it. Secondly, students are more likely to reach the standards set for them if
they are fully aware of the standards before hand, especially if they are given
the opportunity to help make the standards. In many cases, I believe that
students truly understand what they need to work on and will help the teacher
to develop goals to help them achieve those goals. Third, it is a genuinely
fair rubric because of the fact that it is so explicit. If students see the
language very clearly laid out in front of them, stating exactly how they earn
points on an assignment, they are likely to not feel cheated when they miss
points. Obviously, “fairness” requires that teachers are giving students enough
time to complete the task to the standards that have been set.
I think the reaction to an article
should mirror my own and show excitement. Too often it seems as though
assignments are given arbitrary point values and are graded subjectively. This
is a practice that needs to end in a lot of ways. Though students need to be
graded in part on their improvement throughout a class system, certain
assignments require that students be held to standards that indicate their
ability to reach the goals set for them by the state or district. Having such
an explicit rubric for smaller homework assignments also doesn’t always mean
that you are compromising differentiated instruction. Similar to the article I
read for the last class, which argued that keeping students involved in the
scoring process boosted student achievement, I also think that making sure
students are always explicitly aware of what is expected of them will help in
the long run as well.
Works
Cited
Baughin, Judith A., Brod, Evelyn F., and
Page, Deborah L. “Primary Trait Analysis: A Tool for Classroom-Based
Assessment.” College Teaching. 50.2
(2002): 75-80. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment